Rosiglitazone-Metformin Combination Versus Metformin-Sulfonylurea Combination On Beta-Cell Function In Type 2 Diabetes

Overview[ - collapse ][ - ]

Purpose It has been shown in previous study that progressive glycemic deterioration was associated with progressive loss of b-cell function, measured by the decrease in plasma insulin levels, irrespective of the therapy used (diet, sulfonylureas or metformin).There is growing evidence that thiazolidinediones could have a positive action on the b-cell function. But it has not yet been demonstrated that they could protect from a deterioration in insulin secretion in the long term. So, it appears interesting to study the long term evolution of the b-cell function and the possible protection with rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes showing evidence of loss of b-cell function with metformin alone.
ConditionType 2 Diabetes Mellitus
InterventionDrug: rosiglitazone-metformin
Drug: Metformin
Drug: metformin+ gliclazide
PhasePhase 4
SponsorGlaxoSmithKline
Responsible PartyGlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT00367055
First ReceivedAugust 21, 2006
Last UpdatedJuly 20, 2010
Last verifiedJuly 2010

Tracking Information[ + expand ][ + ]

First Received DateAugust 21, 2006
Last Updated DateJuly 20, 2010
Start DateOctober 2004
Estimated Primary Completion DateOctober 2008
Current Primary Outcome MeasuresMedian Change From Baseline in the Insulin Secretory Capacity After a 36-month Treatment [Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36] [Designated as safety issue: No]Change from baseline in the insulin secretory capacity was measured by the assesment of blood insulin concentrations (conc.) using the hyperglycaemic clamp (HC) technique, per intravenous glucose perfusion by a catheter. Change from baseline for insulin conc peaks (highest conc level) was calculated as the Month 36 value minus the baseline value. Insulin secretion was assessed by calculating AUC during the first 10 minutes of HC (incremental and total AUC0-10 min) and the AUC after the first 10 minutes of the HC (10-180min).
Current Secondary Outcome Measures
  • Median Change From Baseline in the Ratio M/I After a 36-month Treatment [Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36] [Designated as safety issue: No]
  • Median Change From Baseline in the Insulin Secretion Capacity After an 18-month Treatment [Time Frame: Baseline and Month 18] [Designated as safety issue: No]Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 18 value minus the baseline value. Insulin secretion capacity is measured in blood (blood level of insulin) and is a response of the pancreatic beta-cells to hyperglycemia induced by a glucose IV bolus, then infusion. Hyperglycemic clamp (HC) is a reference technique to evaluate the initial and the secondary phases of insulin secretion.
  • Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Month 36 [Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36] [Designated as safety issue: No]Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 36 value minus the baseline value. HbA1c levels were measured by blood draw.
  • Mean Change From Baseline in FBG at Month 36 [Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36] [Designated as safety issue: No]Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 36 value minus the baseline value. FBG levels were measured by blood draw.
  • Median Change From Baseline in Insulin Resistance Index (HOMA-IR) After a 36-month Treatment [Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36] [Designated as safety issue: No]
  • Median Change From Baseline in Beta Cell Function Index (HOMA-beta) After a 36-month Treatment [Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36] [Designated as safety issue: No]
  • Mean Change From Baseline in CPP Total and Incremental AUC T0-T30 After a 36-month Treatment [Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36] [Designated as safety issue: No]
  • Mean Change From Baseline in CPP Concentration Peak and Incremental Concentration Peak T0-T30 After a 36-month Treatment [Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36] [Designated as safety issue: No]
  • Mean Change From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Index at Months 18 and 36 [Time Frame: Baseline and Months 18 and 36] [Designated as safety issue: No]Change from baseline was calculated as the Month 18 and 36 values minus the baseline value. Insulin sensitivity is measured as the quantity of glucose metabolized per unit of plasma insulin concentration.

Descriptive Information[ + expand ][ + ]

Brief TitleRosiglitazone-Metformin Combination Versus Metformin-Sulfonylurea Combination On Beta-Cell Function In Type 2 Diabetes
Official TitleComparison of the Action of the Rosiglitazone-metformin Fixed-dose Combination and of a Metformin-sulfonylurea Free Combination on the B-cell Function in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Not Controlled With Metformin Alone.
Brief Summary
It has been shown in previous study that progressive glycemic deterioration was associated
with progressive loss of b-cell function, measured by the decrease in plasma insulin levels,
irrespective of the therapy used (diet, sulfonylureas or metformin).There is growing
evidence that thiazolidinediones could have a positive action on the b-cell function. But it
has not yet been demonstrated that they could protect from a deterioration in insulin
secretion in the long term. So, it appears interesting to study the long term evolution of
the b-cell function and the possible protection with rosiglitazone in patients with type 2
diabetes showing evidence of loss of b-cell function with metformin alone.
Detailed DescriptionNot Provided
Study TypeInterventional
Study PhasePhase 4
Study DesignAllocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
ConditionType 2 Diabetes Mellitus
InterventionDrug: rosiglitazone-metformin
Drug: Metformin
Drug: metformin+ gliclazide
Other Names:
  • rosiglitazone-metformin
  • Metformin
  • metformin+ gliclazide
Study Arm (s)Not Provided

Recruitment Information[ + expand ][ + ]

Recruitment StatusCompleted
Estimated Enrollment84
Estimated Completion DateOctober 2008
Estimated Primary Completion DateOctober 2008
Eligibility Criteria
INCLUSION CRITERIA:

- Males and females 40 to 75 years of age (inclusive at the time of screening)

- Type 2 diabetes mellitus as defined by the WHO criteria, diagnosed for at least 1
year

- Subjects receiving 1.5 to 3g of metformin alone at a constant dose for at least 8
weeks prior to visit 1

- Patients with 6.5% < HbA1c > 8% at visit 1 and visit 2

- 25 < BMI < 35

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

- Patient with type 1 diabetes

- Treatment with other hypoglycaemic agents than metformin in the last 3 months

- FPG >200 mg/dL at visit 2

- Hypersensitivity to the studied treatments (rosiglitazone, metformin chlorhydrate,
gliclazide)

- Congestive heart failure (NYHA class I to IV), unstable or severe angina, recent
myocardial infarction

- Respiratory insufficiency

- Subjects who have required the use of insulin for glycaemic control in the past 6
months prior to visit 1 (except during pregnancy or acute episodes such as
hospitalization, trauma or infection) or subjects with a history of metabolic
acidosis including diabetic ketoacidosis

- Anemia defined by haemoglobin concentration <11.0 g/dL for males and <10.0 g/dL for
females

- Renal disease or renal dysfunction, e.g. as suggested by serum creatinine levels
≥135.0 µmol/L in males and ≥110.0 µmol/L in females and/or creatinine clearance <40
mL/min

- Presence of clinically significant hepatic disease, with ALT, AST, total bilirubin,
alkaline phosphatase >2.5 times the upper limit of the normal reference range

- Subjects with chronic diseases requiring periodic ot intermittent treatment with oral
or IV corticosteroids

- Subjects receiving danazol, miconazole or phenylbutazone

- Active alcohol, drug or medication abuse within the last 6 months or any condition
that would indicate the likelihood of poor subject compliance

- Women who are lactating, pregnant or planning to become pregnant

- Any clinically significant abnormality identified at screening which, in the
investigator's judgement, makes the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study

- Use of any other investigational agent within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is
longer) prior to visit 1

- Subjects who receive or anticipate receiving radiocontrast dye during the study
GenderBoth
Ages40 Years
Accepts Healthy VolunteersNo
ContactsNot Provided
Location CountriesNot Provided

Administrative Information[ + expand ][ + ]

NCT Number NCT00367055
Other Study ID Numbers101765
Has Data Monitoring CommitteeNot Provided
Information Provided ByGlaxoSmithKline
Study SponsorGlaxoSmithKline
CollaboratorsNot Provided
Investigators Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials, MD GlaxoSmithKline
Verification DateJuly 2010