Pioglitazone and Metformin in Diabetic Children

Overview[ - collapse ][ - ]

Purpose HYPOTHESIS: Treatment with pioglitazone is more effective in reducing resistin concentrations and insulin resistance than metformin in children with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pediatric patients aged 8-17 with T2D as defined by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) were included, not under treatment or who had been treated exclusively with diet and exercise or who only received an anti-diabetic agent, as well as those with a history of insulin use who had not applied insulin within 1 month before the initial visit. History of T2D, hypertension, exercise, diet, age, gender and somatometry are recorded. A Blood sample is taken to determine HbA1c, glucose, insulin and resistin. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The percentual change over 4 weeks is analyzed for concentrations of resistin, insulin resistance. Changes are noted for weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 for resistin concentrations, HbA1c and HOMA values. Baseline and final values are compared with a paired t test. Lineal or logarithmic regression analysis is used to evaluate the relationship between homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and resistin concentrations. The statistical significance between variables is determined using ANOVA. The effect of confounding variables is analyzed with a test of co-variance analysis. Statistical significance is considered as p <0.05.
ConditionType 2 Diabetes
InterventionDrug: Metformin
Drug: Pioglitazone
PhasePhase 1/Phase 2
SponsorCoordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico
Responsible PartyCoordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico
ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT01396564
First ReceivedJuly 15, 2011
Last UpdatedJuly 18, 2011
Last verifiedJanuary 2005

Tracking Information[ + expand ][ + ]

First Received DateJuly 15, 2011
Last Updated DateJuly 18, 2011
Start DateOctober 2005
Estimated Primary Completion DateJuly 2011
Current Primary Outcome MeasuresShort-term comparison of metformin and pioglitazone in pediatric patients with T2D [Time Frame: 48 weeks] [Designated as safety issue: No]To compare the effectiveness of metformin vs pioglitazone in children with T2D, in terms of resistin levels and insulin resistance. Compare various markers such as HbA1c,fasting plasma glucose, lipids, and hepatic function.
Current Secondary Outcome MeasuresComparison of long-term effects of metformin vs pioglitazone [Time Frame: 10 years] [Designated as safety issue: No]To compare the effectiveness of metformin vs pioglitazone in children with T2D, in terms of resistin levels and insulin resistance. Compare various markers such as HbA1c,fasting plasma glucose, lipids, and hepatic function over the long-term, as well as any secondary effects.

Descriptive Information[ + expand ][ + ]

Brief TitlePioglitazone and Metformin in Diabetic Children
Official TitleComparison of the Effects of Pioglitazone and Metformin on Resistin Plasma Levels in Children With Type 2 Diabetes
Brief Summary
HYPOTHESIS: Treatment with pioglitazone is more effective in reducing resistin
concentrations and insulin resistance than metformin in children with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D).

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pediatric patients aged 8-17 with T2D as defined by the American
Diabetes Association (ADA) were included, not under treatment or who had been treated
exclusively with diet and exercise or who only received an anti-diabetic agent, as well as
those with a history of insulin use who had not applied insulin within 1 month before the
initial visit. History of T2D, hypertension, exercise, diet, age, gender and somatometry are
recorded. A Blood sample is taken to determine HbA1c, glucose, insulin and resistin.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The percentual change over 4 weeks is analyzed for concentrations of
resistin, insulin resistance. Changes are noted for weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 for resistin
concentrations, HbA1c and HOMA values. Baseline and final values are compared with a paired
t test. Lineal or logarithmic regression analysis is used to evaluate the relationship
between homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and resistin
concentrations. The statistical significance between variables is determined using ANOVA.
The effect of confounding variables is analyzed with a test of co-variance analysis.
Statistical significance is considered as p <0.05.
Detailed Description
At 2 weeks prior to study all subjects meet with a dietician and are instructed to consume a
weight-maintaining diet containing 50% carbohydrate, 30% fat, and 20% protein. During the
week prior to the start of pioglitazone or metformin treatment, all subjects come to the
clinic after a 12 hr overnight fast for a clinical examination (body weight, height, waist
and hip circumferences) and biochemical tests. All tests are done between 8 and 10 am. A
general structured interview is conducted. A questionnaire is used to obtain information on
demographic and socioeconomic aspects. Anthropometric measurements are obtained. Body weight
is measured on a 140-kg capacity floor scale, with the child standing in the center of the
scale. Height is obtained by use of the floor scale's stadiometer, with the child standing
in the center of the scale. Height is measured to the nearest 0.5 cm. Body weight is
measured recorded to the nearest 0.1 Kg. Body Mass Index (BMI) is calculated as weight (Kg)
divided by height (m2). Abdominal circumference is measured to the nearest 0.1 cm at the
level of the greatest frontal extension of the abdomen between the bottom of the rib cage
and the top of the iliac crest. The equipment is regularly calibrated using reference
samples provided by the manufacturer. Baseline measurement of resistin (method) and insulin
concentration (method). At the same time, blood samples are taken for liver function tests,
fasting plasma glucose, lipids, and HbA1c.

All studies are performed at 08:00 h following a 10-12 h overnight fast. Following
completion of these studies, subjects are randomized to start on pioglitazone or metformin,
15 mg/day and 850 mg respectively, for 4 weeks period, subjects return to the Clinical of
Pediatric Endocrinology at 08:00 h, following an overnight fast, for measurement of fasting
plasma glucose concentration, body weight, and blood pressure. Fasting plasma lipids (total
cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol) are measured .
Fructosamine, HbA1c is measured during the initial and final week of pioglitazone or
metformin treatment. Dietary adherence is reinforced. After 4 weeks of treatment, all
subjects undergo a measurement of fasting plasma glucose, resistin, and insulin
concentration.
Study TypeInterventional
Study PhasePhase 1/Phase 2
Study DesignAllocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
ConditionType 2 Diabetes
InterventionDrug: Metformin
850 mg of Metformin daily, increased to 1700 mg after 12 weeks, for the duration of the trial.
Other Names:
Recommended diet and 30 minutes of exercise dailyDrug: Pioglitazone
15 mg of pioglitazone daily, increased to 60 mg after 12 weeks.
Other Names:
Recommended diet and 30 minutes of exercise daily
Study Arm (s)
  • Active Comparator: Metformin
    Randomized patients are given 850 mg of metformin daily, increased to 1700 mg after 12 weeks. Adherence is evaluated and after the first phase, the arm is opened. Fasting plasma glucose concentration, body weight, and blood pressure, fasting plasma lipids (total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol), HbA1c are measured during the initial and final week of treatment. Dietary adherence is reinforced.
  • Active Comparator: Pioglitazone
    Randomized patients are given 15 mg of pioglitazone daily, increased to 60 mg after 12 weeks. Adherence is evaluated and after the first phase, the arm is opened. Fasting plasma glucose concentration, body weight, and blood pressure, fasting plasma lipids (total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol), HbA1c are measured during the initial and final week of treatment. Dietary adherence is reinforced.

Recruitment Information[ + expand ][ + ]

Recruitment StatusCompleted
Estimated Enrollment56
Estimated Completion DateJuly 2011
Estimated Primary Completion DateOctober 2006
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

- Pediatric patients with type 2 diabetes according to ADA.

- Patients who have not previously received anti-diabetic treatment or have been
treated solely with diet and exercise or have received only one anti-diabetic agent,
and who have not applied insulin within 1 month of study start.

- HbA1c between >6.5% and <10%.

- Stable body weight at least 3 months before study start.

- No intense exercise.

- Free of other infectious, chronic, or acute inflammatory processes in the 3 months
prior to study.

- Previous informed consent signed (both children and parents or guardians).

- Either sex

- 8-17 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Personal history of type 1 diabetes

- Chronic renal failure or serum creatinine over 1.0 mg/dl.

- Active hepatic disease (ALT and AST 3 times normal)

- Heart conditions

- Acute or chronic metabolic acidosis

- Receiving steroids or insulin
GenderBoth
Ages8 Years
Accepts Healthy VolunteersNo
ContactsNot Provided
Location CountriesMexico

Administrative Information[ + expand ][ + ]

NCT Number NCT01396564
Other Study ID Numbers2005-3606-0003
Has Data Monitoring CommitteeNo
Information Provided ByCoordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico
Study SponsorCoordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico
CollaboratorsNot Provided
Investigators Study Director: Niels H Wachter, DMSC Supervisor Clinical Research
Verification DateJanuary 2005

Locations[ + expand ][ + ]

Endocrine Outpatient Clinic of the Hospital de Pediatria del CMN "Siglo XXI"
Mexico City, DF, Mexico, 06720