Glyburide and Metformin for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Systematic Review

Overview[ - collapse ][ - ]

Purpose Since the publication in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) in 2000 of the Langer's trial comparing glyburide vs insulin in the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), additional studies of oral agents for the treatment of GDM have been published (observational, randomized controlled trials (RCT), and trials using other drugs like metformin). Some meta-analysis to summarize the evidence have been published: Nicholson 2009 (including 4 RCT addressing different drugs), Dhulkotia 2010 (including 6 RCT addressing different drugs, the meta-analysis combining all drugs altogether), Gui 2013 (including 5 RCT addressing metformin vs insulin). Oral agents are increasingly used for the treatment of GDM. Investigators aim to update the evidence on RCTs comparing glyburide and metformin vs insulin or between them and summarize this evidence using meta-analysis tools. Specifically, investigators aim at producing distinct meta-analyses for each one of the three drug comparisons. This information is not available in the literature since the most recent systematic reviews specifically dealing on oral agents for the treatment of GDM have addressed a single drug comparison (Gui 2013) or have combined different drug comparisons into a single meta-analysis (Dhulkotia 2010)
ConditionGestational Diabetes Mellitus
InterventionDrug: Glyburide vs Insulin trials
Drug: Metformin vs Insulin trials
Drug: Metformin vs Glyburide trials
PhaseN/A
SponsorFundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Responsible PartyFundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT01998113
First ReceivedNovember 8, 2013
Last UpdatedDecember 4, 2013
Last verifiedNovember 2013

Tracking Information[ + expand ][ + ]

First Received DateNovember 8, 2013
Last Updated DateDecember 4, 2013
Start DateMarch 2013
Estimated Primary Completion DateDecember 2013
Current Primary Outcome Measures
  • 3rd trimester glycated hemoglobin [Time Frame: 3rd trimester of pregnancy] [Designated as safety issue: No]mean difference of 3rd trimester glycated hemoglobin
  • total maternal weight gain [Time Frame: during pregnancy] [Designated as safety issue: No]mean difference of total maternal weight gain (as defined by the authors)
  • severe maternal hypoglycemia [Time Frame: from enrollment to delivery] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of severe maternal hypoglycemia (as defined by the authors)
  • preeclampsia [Time Frame: during pregnancy or puerperium] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of preeclampsia (as defined by the authors)
  • cesarean section [Time Frame: at the end of pregnancy] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of cesarean section (as defined by the authors)
  • gestational age at birth [Time Frame: at birth] [Designated as safety issue: No]mean difference of gestational age at birth (as defined by the authors)
  • preterm birth [Time Frame: at birth] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of preterm birth (as defined by the authors)
  • birthweight [Time Frame: at birth] [Designated as safety issue: No]mean difference of birthweight (as defined by the authors)
  • macrosomia [Time Frame: at birth] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of macrosomia (defined as birthweight >=4000 g)
  • large-for-gestational age newborn [Time Frame: at birth] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of large-for-gestational age newborn (as defined by the authors)
  • small-for-gestational age newborn [Time Frame: at birth] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of small-for-gestational age newborn (as defined by the authors)
  • neonatal hypoglycemia [Time Frame: in the neonatal period] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of neonatal hypoglycemia (as provided by the authors)
  • perinatal mortality [Time Frame: in the perinatal period] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of perinatal mortality (as defined by the authors)
  • insulin treatment [Time Frame: from enrollment to delivery] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of insulin treatment (for trials comparing metformin vs glyburide)
Current Secondary Outcome Measures
  • fasting blood glucose [Time Frame: in the period from enrollment to delivery] [Designated as safety issue: No]mean difference of fasting blood glucose (as defined by the authors)
  • postprandial blood glucose [Time Frame: in the period from enrollment to delivery] [Designated as safety issue: No]mean difference of postprandial blood glucose (as defined by the authors)
  • maternal weight gain since enrollment [Time Frame: in the period from enrollment to delivery] [Designated as safety issue: No]mean difference of maternal weight gain since enrollment (as defined by the authors)
  • pregnancy-induced hypertension [Time Frame: during pregnancy] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension (as defined by the authors)
  • induction of labour [Time Frame: at the end of pregnancy] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of induction of labour (as described by the authors)
  • cord C peptide [Time Frame: at birth] [Designated as safety issue: No]mean difference of cord C peptide (as defined by the authors)
  • cord insulin [Time Frame: at birth] [Designated as safety issue: No]mean difference of cord insulin (as defined by the authors)
  • abnormal 1 min Apgar [Time Frame: at birth] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of abnormal 1 min Apgar (defined as lower than 7)
  • abnormal 5 min Apgar [Time Frame: at birth] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of abnormal 5 min Apgar (defined as lower than 7)
  • obstetric trauma [Time Frame: at birth] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of obstetric trauma (as defined by the authors)
  • severe neonatal hypoglycemia [Time Frame: in the neonatal period] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of severe neonatal hypoglycemia (as defined by the authors)
  • neonatal jaundice [Time Frame: in the neonatal period] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of neonatal jaundice (as defined by the authors)
  • significant respiratory distress [Time Frame: in the neonatal period] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of significant respiratory distress (described as respiratory distress syndrome or requiring respiratory support)
  • stillbirth [Time Frame: in the antenatal period] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of stillbirth (as defined by the authors)
  • neonatal mortality [Time Frame: in the neonatal period] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of neonatal mortality (as defined by the authors)
  • Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admittance [Time Frame: in the neonatal period] [Designated as safety issue: No]relative risk of NICU admittance (as defined by the authors)

Descriptive Information[ + expand ][ + ]

Brief TitleGlyburide and Metformin for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Systematic Review
Official TitleGlyburide and Metformin for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing These Drugs Either vs Insulin or vs Each Other.
Brief Summary
Since the publication in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) in 2000 of the Langer's
trial comparing glyburide vs insulin in the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus
(GDM), additional studies of oral agents for the treatment of GDM have been published
(observational, randomized controlled trials (RCT), and trials using other drugs like
metformin).

Some meta-analysis to summarize the evidence have been published: Nicholson 2009 (including
4 RCT addressing different drugs), Dhulkotia 2010 (including 6 RCT addressing different
drugs, the meta-analysis combining all drugs altogether), Gui 2013 (including 5 RCT
addressing metformin vs insulin).

Oral agents are increasingly used for the treatment of GDM. Investigators aim to update the
evidence on RCTs comparing glyburide and metformin vs insulin or between them and summarize
this evidence using meta-analysis tools. Specifically, investigators aim at producing
distinct meta-analyses for each one of the three drug comparisons. This information is not
available in the literature since the most recent systematic reviews specifically dealing on
oral agents for the treatment of GDM have addressed a single drug comparison (Gui 2013) or
have combined different drug comparisons into a single meta-analysis (Dhulkotia 2010)
Detailed Description
This project involves the systematic review of RCT addressing the use of glyburide or
metformin for the treatment of GDM. The review will include RCT comparing these drugs versus
insulin or making direct comparisons between the two oral agents in pregnant women with GDM.

Investigators have pre-specified a series of maternal and fetal outcomes of interest.

A comprehensive electronic search strategy will be complemented with a search of
bibliographies from relevant studies and the contact of authors from the eligible studies
regarding issues on study design or information on primary outcomes.

The risk of bias of included studies will be analyzed and this information used to perform
sensitivity analyses. If possible, data from original studies will be pooled into relative
risks for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences for continuous outcomes.

Heterogeneity will be explored for all the analyses. Analyses will be undertaken using a
fixed effects model that will be repeated using a random effects model in case of
substantial heterogeneity.

Results of the systematic review will be published following PRISMA guidance.
Study TypeObservational
Study PhaseN/A
Study DesignTime Perspective: Retrospective
ConditionGestational Diabetes Mellitus
InterventionDrug: Glyburide vs Insulin trials
Affecting groups 1 and 2
Drug: Metformin vs Insulin trials
Affecting groups 3 and 4
Drug: Metformin vs Glyburide trials
Affecting groups 5 and 6
Study Arm (s)
  • Glyburide (Glyburide vs Insulin)
    Glyburide vs Insulin trials
  • Insulin (Glyburide vs Insulin)
    Glyburide vs Insulin trials
  • Metformin (Metformin vs Insulin)
    Metformin vs Insulin trials
  • Insulin (Metformin vs Insulin)
    Metformin vs Insulin trials
  • Metformin (Metformin vs Glyburide)
    Metformin vs Glyburide trials
  • Glyburide (Metformin vs Glyburide)
    Metformin vs Glyburide trials

Recruitment Information[ + expand ][ + ]

Recruitment StatusActive, not recruiting
Estimated EnrollmentNot Provided
Estimated Completion DateDecember 2013
Estimated Primary Completion DateNovember 2013
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

- RCT

- GDM

- comparing Glyburide vs Insulin, Metformin vs Insulin or Metformin vs Glyburide

- data on fetal and/or maternal outcomes

- full text available

Exclusion Criteria:

- significant overlap with other articles of the same group
GenderFemale
AgesN/A
Accepts Healthy VolunteersNo
ContactsNot Provided
Location CountriesSpain

Administrative Information[ + expand ][ + ]

NCT Number NCT01998113
Other Study ID NumbersIIBSP-ADO-2013-153
Has Data Monitoring CommitteeNo
Information Provided ByFundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Study SponsorFundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
CollaboratorsNot Provided
Investigators Not Provided
Verification DateNovember 2013

Locations[ + expand ][ + ]

Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, Spain, 08025