Combine TACE and RFA Versus RFA Monotherapy in Unilobar HCC of 3.1 to 7 cm Patient | RxWiki

Combine TACE and RFA Versus RFA Monotherapy in Unilobar HCC of 3.1 to 7 cm Patient

Overview[ - collapse ][ - ]

Purpose	Abstract of Research Proposal Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been proved to be a curative treatment with minimal invasiveness and high efficacy for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that is generally defined as maximal diameter no larger than 3cm. RFA can achieve a rate of complete necrosis as 80-100% in small HCC. However, the rate will drop to 71% in HCC of 3.1-5cm and 25% for HCC larger than 5cm。This is due to the relative hypervascularity for the bigger tumor and it will induce heat sink that leading to less effect of ablation. Therefore, transcatheter chemoembolization (TACE) before RFA may reduce the vascularity and enhance the effect of subsequent RFA. Moreover, pre-RF TACE will reduce the tumor size and the subsequent RFA will be more effective than RFA alone. In retrospective studies, Kitamoto M et al showed that tumor necrosis diameter was larger in TACE and RFA combination therapies compared to RFA mono-therapy; Yamakado K et al showed that TACE and RFA combination therapies in HCC (maximal diameter up to 12 cm) achieved 100% complete necrosis, 0% local recurrence rate and 93% of 2-year survival rate. Nevertheless, only one randomized trial in intermediate size HCC (3-5cm in diameter) showed that TACE and RFA combination therapies achieved a significant higher rate of complete necrosis, technique success, fewer treatment sessions to achieve complete necrosis and lower local recurrence but non-significant difference in 3-year survival rate. Therefore, based on the limited studies, combine TACE and RFA may achieve better effects than RFA mono-therapy in HCC larger than 3cm. However, repeat TACE may induce some complications such as HBV reactivation, hepatitis or even liver decompensation. Moreover, novel RFA using simultaneous multiple RFA probes with switching RF controller may achieve a better effects and shorter ablation time than sequential RFA with single electrode. Thus, is it still necessary using TACE and RFA combination therapies for HCC >3cm when application of novel switching RF controller? The aim of the current study is to conduct a RCT comparing combine TACE and RFA compared to RFA mono-therapy by using simultaneous multiple electrodes and switching RF controller in uni-lobar HCC of 3.1-7cm. The rate of complete necrosis, technique success, sessions to achieve CN, local tumor progression, survival rate and major complications will be analyzed. Investigators cannot expect which one is better, safer before the achievement of the study.
Condition	Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Intervention	Procedure: Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Procedure: Radiofrequency ablation Drug: Doxorubicin
Phase	Phase 2
Sponsor	Shi-Ming Lin
Responsible Party	Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier	NCT01858207
First Received	May 11, 2013
Last Updated	May 22, 2013
Last verified	May 2013

Tracking Information[ + expand ][ + ]

First Received Date	May 11, 2013
Last Updated Date	May 22, 2013
Start Date	January 2012
Estimated Primary Completion Date	December 2014
Current Primary Outcome Measures	The rate of complete necrosis (CN) [Time Frame: 2014 Dec (up to 3 years)] [Designated as safety issue: No]The complete necrosis (or complete coagulation, complete necrosis, complete response) that is defined as persistent hypo-attenuation of the tumor on triphasic dynamic CT scan or MRI one month after the last ablation therapy. When no enhancing lesion was seen on CT after the initial ablation, primary technique effectiveness was considered to have been achieved. When lesion enhancement was still seen on CT, primary technique effectiveness was not considered as achieved. A course of treatment for each tumour was limited to three RF ablation sessions within 3 months
Current Secondary Outcome Measures	Primary technique effectiveness [Time Frame: 2014 Dec (up to 3 years)] [Designated as safety issue: Yes]i.e. achievement of complete necrosis after maximum of 3 treatment sessions. When no enhancing lesion was seen on CT after the initial ablation, primary technique effectiveness was considered to have been achieved. When lesion enhancement was still seen on CT, primary technique effectiveness was not considered as achieved. A course of treatment for each tumour was limited to three RF ablation sessions within 3 months. local tumor progression of HCC [Time Frame: 2014 Dec (up to 3 years)] [Designated as safety issue: No]this was defined as the appearance of nodular enhancement contiguous with the ablated tumor on dynamic imaging or an increase in the size of the ablated area on follow-up imaging of a tumor that was previously completely ablated. Survival [Time Frame: 2014 dec (up to 3 years)] [Designated as safety issue: No]That was determined from the date of RF ablation to that of last follow-up or death. Major complication [Time Frame: 2014 Dec (up to 3 years)] [Designated as safety issue: Yes]that was defined as those requiring treatment with hospitalization or involving permanent adverse sequelae.

Descriptive Information[ + expand ][ + ]

Brief Title	Combine TACE and RFA Versus RFA Monotherapy in Unilobar HCC of 3.1 to 7 cm Patient
Official Title	Combine Chemoembolization and Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Monotherapy for Patients With Unilobar Hepatocellular Carcinoma of 3.1 to 7 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Brief Summary	Abstract of Research Proposal Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been proved to be a curative treatment with minimal invasiveness and high efficacy for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that is generally defined as maximal diameter no larger than 3cm. RFA can achieve a rate of complete necrosis as 80-100% in small HCC. However, the rate will drop to 71% in HCC of 3.1-5cm and 25% for HCC larger than 5cm。This is due to the relative hypervascularity for the bigger tumor and it will induce heat sink that leading to less effect of ablation. Therefore, transcatheter chemoembolization (TACE) before RFA may reduce the vascularity and enhance the effect of subsequent RFA. Moreover, pre-RF TACE will reduce the tumor size and the subsequent RFA will be more effective than RFA alone. In retrospective studies, Kitamoto M et al showed that tumor necrosis diameter was larger in TACE and RFA combination therapies compared to RFA mono-therapy; Yamakado K et al showed that TACE and RFA combination therapies in HCC (maximal diameter up to 12 cm) achieved 100% complete necrosis, 0% local recurrence rate and 93% of 2-year survival rate. Nevertheless, only one randomized trial in intermediate size HCC (3-5cm in diameter) showed that TACE and RFA combination therapies achieved a significant higher rate of complete necrosis, technique success, fewer treatment sessions to achieve complete necrosis and lower local recurrence but non-significant difference in 3-year survival rate. Therefore, based on the limited studies, combine TACE and RFA may achieve better effects than RFA mono-therapy in HCC larger than 3cm. However, repeat TACE may induce some complications such as HBV reactivation, hepatitis or even liver decompensation. Moreover, novel RFA using simultaneous multiple RFA probes with switching RF controller may achieve a better effects and shorter ablation time than sequential RFA with single electrode. Thus, is it still necessary using TACE and RFA combination therapies for HCC >3cm when application of novel switching RF controller? The aim of the current study is to conduct a RCT comparing combine TACE and RFA compared to RFA mono-therapy by using simultaneous multiple electrodes and switching RF controller in uni-lobar HCC of 3.1-7cm. The rate of complete necrosis, technique success, sessions to achieve CN, local tumor progression, survival rate and major complications will be analyzed. Investigators cannot expect which one is better, safer before the achievement of the study.
Detailed Description	Specific Aims: The aim of the current study is to compare TACE and RFA combination therapies with RFA mono-therapy by using simultaneous multiple electrodes and switching RF controller in the treatment of uni-lobar HCC of 3.1 to 7cm. The rate of complete necrosis (CN), technique success, sessions to achieve CN, local tumor progression, survival rate and major complications will be analyzed. Background: HCC is 4th mostly common malignancy worldwide and the leading cause of cancer-death in Taiwan. Surveillance programs can detect HCC at early stage. Surgical resection, liver transplantation and local ablation are currently considered as curative treatment modalities for early stage HCC. However, only 10-30% of early stage HCC is suitable for resection due to poor liver reserve, co-morbidity and shortage of liver donor. Therefore, local ablation plays an important role in the treatment of unresectable or resectable early-stage HCC. Among the various local ablative modalities, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been proved to be a curative treatment with minimal invasiveness and high efficacy for small HCC that is generally defined as maximal diameter no larger than 3cm. RFA can achieve a rate of complete necrosis as 80-100% in small HCC. However, the rate will drop to 71% in HCC of 3.1-5cm and 25% for HCC > 5cm。 The difference is due to the relative hypervascularity for the bigger tumor and it will induce heat sink that leading to less effect of ablation. Therefore, transcatheter chemoembolization (TACE) before RFA may reduce the vascularity and enhance the effect of subsequent RFA. Moreover, pre-RF TACE will reduce the tumor size and the subsequent RFA to unembolized viable tumor will be more effective than RFA alone. In retrospective studies, Kitamoto M et al showed that tumor necrosis diameter was larger in combine TACE and RFA compared to RFA monotherapy; Yamakado K et al showed that combine TACE and RFA in HCC (maximal diameter up to 12 cm) achieved 100% complete necrosis, 0% local recurrence rate and 93% of 2-year survival rate. Nevertheless, only one randomized trial in intermediate size HCC (3-5cm in diameter) showed that combine TACE and RFA achieved a significant higher rate of technique success, fewer treatment sessions and lower local recurrence but non-significant in 3-year survival rate. Therefore, based on the limited studies, combine TACE and RFA may achieve better effects than RFA mono-therapy in HCC larger than 3cm. However, repeat TACE may induce some complications such as HBV reactivation, hepatitis or even liver decompensation. Moreover, novel RFA using simultaneous multiple RFA probes with switching RF controller may achieve a better effects and shorter ablation time than sequential RFA with single electrode. Thus, is it still necessary using TACE and RFA combination therapies for HCC > 3cm when application of novel switching RF controller? aim of the current study is to conduct a RCT comparing combine TACE and RFA compared to RFA mono-therapy by using simultaneous multiple electrodes and switching RF controller in uni-lobar HCC of 3.1-7cm. The rate of complete necrosis, sessions to achieve CN, primary technique effectiveness (i.e. achievement of complete necrosis after maximum of 3 treatment sessions), local tumor progression, survival rate and major complications will be analyzed.
Study Type	Interventional
Study Phase	Phase 2
Study Design	Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition	Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Intervention	Procedure: Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization traditional TACE, conventional TACE Other Names: TACE, ChemoembolizationProcedure: Radiofrequency ablation simultaneous multiple electrodes and switching RF controller Other Names: RFADrug: Doxorubicin TACE will be done according to the current method in our center. We use intra-injection of lipiodol mized with doxorubicin when the catheter was placed in the superselective location very close to the tumor. Gelfoam sponge was then injected to temporarily occlude the arterial blood flow. Other Names: Doxorubicin
Study Arm (s)	Active Comparator: TACE+ RFA This arm will be conventional TACE(Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization) plus RFA(radiofrequency ablation. use intra-injection of lipiodol mized with doxorubicin when the catheter was placed in the superselective location very close to the tumor. Active Comparator: RFA Recent advances in local ablation are aimed to expand the ablation size (> 3cm in diameter) in a minimal session by utilizing the switching RF controller and simultaneous 2 or 3 RF electrodes placement. The procedure of RFA was according to manufacture algorithm. RFA was performed within 7 days after TACE because the embolization effect in reducing blood flow will be not evident afterwards.

Recruitment Information[ + expand ][ + ]

Recruitment Status	Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment	60
Estimated Completion Date	December 2014
Estimated Primary Completion Date	July 2014
Eligibility Criteria	Inclusion Criteria: - Age >18 years; - Unresectable HCC or patients with resectable HCC but not appropriate for resection;. - Tumor stage: single tumor with 3.1-7cm in diameter, or multiple (maximum 3) tumors with at least one over 3cm but only one of the multiple tumors larger than 5cm for concerning too prolonged time of RFA. All the target tumors are located in single lobe. - The lesion should be detected on ultrasonography; - The divergence of the hepatic artery was suitable for TACE; - Absence of portal and venous thrombosis, extrahepatic metastases, or uncontrollable ascites; - Patients in Child-Pugh grade A or B; - Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or less; - Patient has signed consent form regarding participation in the study. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients had previously received any treatment for HCC; - Patients with known renal or cardiovascular disease before TACE; - Child-Pugh grade C cirrhosis, prior decompensation and history of encephalopathy before TACE - Pregnancy or plan to pregnant in the subsequent study period (1 to 2 years)
Gender	Both
Ages	18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers	No
Contacts	Contact: Shi-Ming Lin, MD. 886-3-3281200 lsmpaicyto@cgmh.org.tw
Location Countries	Taiwan

Administrative Information[ + expand ][ + ]

NCT Number	NCT01858207
Other Study ID Numbers	CMRPG3B0121
Has Data Monitoring Committee	No
Information Provided By	Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Study Sponsor	Shi-Ming Lin
Collaborators	Not Provided
Investigators	Principal Investigator: Shi-Ming Lin, MD Chang Gung Medical Foundation
Verification Date	May 2013

Locations[ + expand ][ + ]