The CANTATA-MP Trial (CANagliflozin Treatment and Trial Analysis - Metformin and Pioglitazone)

Overview[ - collapse ][ - ]

Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 different doses of canagliflozin compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are receving treatment with metformin and pioglitazone and have inadequate glycemic (blood sugar) control.
ConditionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2
InterventionDrug: Placebo
Drug: Canagliflozin
Drug: Sitagliptin
Drug: Metformin
Drug: Pioglitazone
PhasePhase 3
SponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLC
Responsible PartyJanssen Research & Development, LLC
ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT01106690
First ReceivedApril 1, 2010
Last UpdatedJune 26, 2013
Last verifiedJune 2013

Tracking Information[ + expand ][ + ]

First Received DateApril 1, 2010
Last Updated DateJune 26, 2013
Start DateJune 2010
Estimated Primary Completion DateJuly 2012
Current Primary Outcome MeasuresChange in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26 [Time Frame: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26] [Designated as safety issue: No]The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Current Secondary Outcome Measures
  • Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26 [Time Frame: Week 26] [Designated as safety issue: No]The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c<7% at Week 26 in each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the percentage.
  • Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26 [Time Frame: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26] [Designated as safety issue: No]The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
  • Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA2-%B) From Baseline to Week 26 [Time Frame: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26] [Designated as safety issue: No]HOMA2-%B is a measure of beta cell function (the cells in the pancreas that produce and store insulin). The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HOMA2-%B from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
  • Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26 [Time Frame: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26] [Designated as safety issue: No]The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change.
  • Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 26 [Time Frame: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26] [Designated as safety issue: No]The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
  • Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 26 [Time Frame: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26] [Designated as safety issue: No]The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change.
  • Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 26 [Time Frame: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26] [Designated as safety issue: No]The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change.

Descriptive Information[ + expand ][ + ]

Brief TitleThe CANTATA-MP Trial (CANagliflozin Treatment and Trial Analysis - Metformin and Pioglitazone)
Official TitleA Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Arm, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin and Pioglitazone Therapy
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 different doses of
canagliflozin compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are
receving treatment with metformin and pioglitazone and have inadequate glycemic (blood
sugar) control.
Detailed Description
Canagliflozin is a drug that is being tested to see if it may be useful in treating patients
diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This is a randomized (study drug assigned by
chance), double-blind (neither the patient or the study doctor will know the name of the
assigned treatment), parallel-group, 3-arm (3 treatment groups) multicenter study to
determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of canagliflozin (100 mg and 300 mg)
compared to placebo (a capsule that looks like all the other treatments but has no real
medicine) in patients with T2DM who are not achieving an adequate response from current
antihyperglycemic therapy with metformin and pioglitazone to control their diabetes.
Approximately 360 patients with T2DM who are receiving combination therapy with metformin
and pioglitazone will receive the addition of once-daily treatment with canagliflozin (100
mg or 300 mg) or placebo capsules for 26 weeks followed by a 26-week extension period where
patients treated with canagliflozin (100 mg or 300 mg) will continue treatment for an
additional 26 weeks and patients treated with placebo will be switched to active
double-blind treatment with sitagliptin 100 mg, an antihyperglycemic agent administered
once-daily for 26 weeks. In addition, all patients will take protocol specified stable doses
of metformin and pioglitazone along with assigned study drug for the duration of the study.
Patients will participate in the study for approximately 59 to 78 weeks. During the study,
if a patient's fasting blood sugar remains high despite treatment with study drug, the
patient will receive treatment with glimepiride (rescue therapy) in accordance with local
prescribing information. During treatment, patients will be monitored for safety by review
of adverse events, results from laboratory tests, 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), vital
signs measurements, body weight, physical examinations, and self-monitored blood glucose
(SMGB) measurements. The primary outcome measure in the study is the effect of canagliflozin
relative to placebo on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) after 26 weeks of treatment. Study drug will
be taken orally (by mouth) once daily before the first meal each day unless otherwise
specified. Patients will take single-blind placebo capsules for 2 weeks before
randomization. After randomization, patients will take double-blind canagliflozin (100 mg or
300 mg) for 52 weeks OR placebo for 26 weeks switched to double-blind sitagliptin 100 mg for
26 weeks.
Study TypeInterventional
Study PhasePhase 3
Study DesignAllocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
ConditionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2
InterventionDrug: Placebo
One matching placebo capsule orally (by mouth) once daily for 26 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.
Drug: Canagliflozin
One 100 mg or 300 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally once daily for 52 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.
Drug: Sitagliptin
One 100 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally once daily beginning at Week 26 until Week 52 with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.
Drug: Metformin
The patient's stable dose of metformin background therapy should be continued throughout the study.
Drug: Pioglitazone
The patient's stable dose of pioglitazone background therapy should be continued throughout the study.
Study Arm (s)
  • Other: Placebo/Sitagliptin
    Each patient will receive matching placebo once daily for 26 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone. At Week 26, patients will be switched from placebo to 100 mg of sitagliptin once daily with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone until Week 52.
  • Experimental: Canagliflozin 100 mg
    Each patient will receive 100 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 52 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.
  • Experimental: Canagliflozin 300 mg
    Each patient will receive 300 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 52 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.

Recruitment Information[ + expand ][ + ]

Recruitment StatusCompleted
Estimated Enrollment344
Estimated Completion DateJuly 2012
Estimated Primary Completion DateNovember 2011
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

- All patients must have a diagnosis of T2DM and be currently treated with PPAR gamma
agent ((pioglitazone or rosiglitazone) and another anti-diabetes agent (metformin)

- Patients in the study must have a HbA1c between >=7 and <=10.5% and a fasting plasma
glucose (FPG) <270 mg/dL (15 mmol/L)

Exclusion Criteria:

- History of diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), pancreas or beta
cell transplantation, or diabetes secondary to pancreatitis or pancreatectomy

- or a severe hypoglycemic episode within 6 months before screening
GenderBoth
Ages18 Years
Accepts Healthy VolunteersNo
ContactsNot Provided
Location CountriesUnited States, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, India, Mexico, Spain, Thailand, United Kingdom

Administrative Information[ + expand ][ + ]

NCT Number NCT01106690
Other Study ID NumbersCR017032
Has Data Monitoring CommitteeYes
Information Provided ByJanssen Research & Development, LLC
Study SponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLC
CollaboratorsNot Provided
Investigators Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC C. Clinical Trial Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Verification DateJune 2013

Locations[ + expand ][ + ]

United States, Alabama
Anniston, Alabama, United States
United States, Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
United States, Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, United States
United States, Arkansas
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
United States, California
Burlingame, California, United States
United States, California
Encinitas, California, United States
United States, California
Fullerton, California, United States
United States, California
Roseville, California, United States
United States, California
Santa Ana, California, United States
United States, California
Wes Hills, California, United States
United States, Colorado
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
United States, Florida
Bartow, Florida, United States
United States, Florida
Hollywood, Florida, United States
United States, Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
United States, Florida
Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
United States, Iowa
Des Moines, Iowa, United States
United States, Louisiana
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
United States, Minnesota
Chaska, Minnesota, United States
United States, Mississippi
Picayune, Mississippi, United States
United States, Montana
Billings, Montana, United States
United States, North Carolina
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
United States, North Carolina
Hickory, North Carolina, United States
United States, North Carolina
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
United States, Ohio
Dublin, Ohio, United States
United States, Ohio
Perrysburg, Ohio, United States
United States, Oklahoma
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
United States, Oklahoma
Yukon, Oklahoma, United States
United States, Pennsylvania
Bensalem, Pennsylvania, United States
United States, Tennessee
Bristol, Tennessee, United States
United States, Tennessee
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
United States, Tennessee
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
United States, Texas
Arlington, Texas, United States
United States, Texas
Dallas, Texas, United States
United States, Texas
Grand Prairie, Texas, United States
United States, Texas
Houston, Texas, United States
United States, Texas
New Braunfels, Texas, United States
United States, Texas
San Antonio, Texas, United States
United States, Virginia
Falls Church, Virginia, United States
United States, Virginia
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States
United States, Washington
Federal Way, Washington, United States
United States, Washington
Selah, Washington, United States
Canada, New Brunswick
Bathurst, New Brunswick, Canada
Canada, New Brunswick
Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
Canada, Newfoundland and Labrador
Grand Falls-Windsor, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Canada, Ontario
Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Canada, Ontario
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Canada, Ontario
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Canada, Ontario
Smiths Falls, Ontario, Canada
Canada, Ontario
Thornhill, Ontario, Canada
Canada, Quebec
Drummondville, Quebec, Canada
Canada
Calgary, Canada
Canada
Mount Pearl, Canada
Canada
Truro, Canada
Finland
Kuopio, Finland
Finland
Oulu, Finland
Finland
Turku, Finland
France
Bondy Cedex, France
France
Le Creusot, France
France
Narbonne Cedex, France
Germany
Aschaffenburg, Germany
Germany
Mainz, Germany
Germany
Neuwied, Germany
Germany
Schkeuditz, Germany
Greece
Athens, Greece
Greece
Thessaloniki, Greece
Greece
Thessalonikis, Greece
India
Ahmedabad, India
India
Belgaum, India
India
Chennai, India
India
Coimbatore, India
India
Jaipur, India
India
Nagpur, India
Mexico
Chihuahua, Mexico
Mexico
Ciudad Juarez, Mexico
Mexico
Durango, Mexico
Mexico
Mexico, Mexico
Spain
Almería, Spain
Spain
Madrid, Spain
Spain
Sevilla, Spain
Thailand
Bangkok, Thailand
Thailand
Khon Kaen, Thailand
United Kingdom
Antrim, United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Belfast, United Kingdom